The
reading selection for my new book club was Donna Tartt's "The Goldfinch," a
hefty 775 page book which I'd been reading for the month. I had a
little over 100 pages to go on Monday and read until I couldn't stay awake
any more, so went to sleep.
When I woke up at 5, instead of
going back to sleep I started reading again and finally finished the book
(rushing through the last pages) by 7 a.m., which was just in the neck of
time, since I had to leave for Char's house and the book club meeting around
11.
It's an odd book and what I said in my review of it was
that I had a love-hate relationship with it, since it seemed almost like it
was four different books and there were sections I hated and sections where
the writing was so beautiful, I reveled in it, much as I do with Steinbeck
or with Pat Conroy's "Prince of Tides."
The story is about a
painting by Dutch artist Carel Fabritus, who painted it in 1654. It
hangs in the Mauritshuis museum in the Hague. In the book, young Theo
is visiting the Metropolitan Museum (in New York) for an exhibit of Dutch
Masters when there is an explosion that kills his mother. Theo
survives and in escaping the museum, he takes with him the small painting
(it is about the size of a piece of typing paper). He's not sure why
he takes it, but his mother loved the painting and it is his connection to
her.
Interestingly, I discovered that while I knew this was
the last painting Fabritus did, I didn't realize that he was killed in an
explosion. I'm sure this must have inspired the author when she
started working out her plot for the book.
It's an odd
painting for us since it shows a goldfinch chained to a post by a
little chain around its leg. Apparently keeping finches as pets like
this was popular in the 1600s.
It was so much fun having a group of people to discuss this
book with, since everyone had such interesting things to add. It's a book
about damaged people and how they cope with life. Sadly, much of the
coping has to do with drugs...massive amounts of drugs...and I did get tired
of the drug taking, which dominates one section of the book and is very much
a part of the rest of it. Two people in the book group hated that so
much they didn't finish the book. But I'm glad I stuck with it to the
end because there was a fairly satisfying resolution.
I think
I'm going to enjoy this group since I love discussing books and it's nice to
find a group of people who enjoy discussing them too.
Of
course I'm kind of an interloper in the group, since it is run through the
San Ramon public library and technically I'm supposed to be a resident of
San Ramon to attend. In fact, when the leader asked for my email
address yesterday, I gave her my gmail account rather than my Davis account.
Char says she's going to let her know that I'm really not from San Ramon but
doesn't think she will care, especially now that I've been there for two
meetings.
On the
ride home, I had my Harlan Coben book to listen to, which was good because
there was bumper to bumper traffic for a good part of the trip and audio
books always make times like that much more palatable!
2 comments:
I agree that a book group meeting would have been great for this book! I wish my group had selected it. And I said the same thing about sections of the book that I loved and didn't love as much. But overall, I would say it was one of the best books I read last year.
I held off reading this book for a really long time because of how long it was, but once I got started, I really did enjoy it a lot. I have a love/hate relationship with the ending.
Unrelated, I'm about 80% done with the 2nd Outlander book and I can't wait for this book to be over. I'm really hoping there's a payoff at the end.
Post a Comment