Today was a good day at Logos. I like the days when we have
lots of interesting (and some quirky) customers, but today it was dead as a doornail.
I think I made fewer than 10 sales in the four hours I worked (and one of them was me!)
But I was able to find an interesting book that was the right length
to complete while there in the store (and I did). It was called "More than
Petticoats: Remarkable California Women" by Erin H. Turner. (Apparently
"More than Petticoats" is a series of books about women in various states around
the country.)
The author sets out to debunk the common saying about talented women
"imagine what she could do if she had been a man." "The
women who were chosen for this book are remarkable because they are women, not in spite of
it," she writes.
I was hooked from the first chapter, which tells the story of Mary
Ellen Pleasant, whom I remember hearing about, growing up in San Francisco as "Mammy
Pleasant," and only knew that there was something negative about her.
Apparently the scuttlebut about her was that she was a "Voodoo priestess", a
baby stealer, a baby eater, a multiple murderess, a madam, a lying, conniving, and
cunning, schemer." How far from the truth!
It turns out she was called "the Mother of Civil Rights in
California" from work begun in the 1860s, her achievements went unsurpassed until the
1960s. Pleasant was once the most talked-about woman in San Francisco. When other African
Americans were rarely mentioned, she claimed full-page articles in the press. Her dramatic
life was part of the story of slavery, abolition, the gold rush, and the Civil War; she
helped shape early San Francisco, and covertly amassed a joint fortune once assessed at
$30,000,000. She became the business partner (and perhaps more) for wealthy Thomas Bell
and lived with him and his wife for many years until his death, after which Mrs. Bell
accused her of murdering her husband and sued her for the home that Pleasant had designed
for the family.
She died, penniless, in 1904, but finally got public recognition in
2011, when a memorial was dedicated in Sonoma.
(if you can't read it it says "mother of civil rights in California)
The book goes on to give thumbnail sketches of people like Sarah
Winchester, heiress to the fabulous Winchester rifle fortune. She was the woman who
built the Winchester Mystery house, which I have wanted to tour for decades. I
learned the back story (which includes the death of a child and then her husband.
Isadora Duncan is in there. I never thought of her as a
California woman, but apparently she was born here, though she didn't really achieve fame
until she moved to Western Europe and later Russia. American audiences weren't ready
for her scantily clad modern dances.
There are several other lesser known women, but eventually you get to
Mary Pickford, who really helped create the movie business as it exists today. With
her tiny stature and bouncy curls, she was playing young girls into her 30s (sounds like
Gilbert & Sullivan tenors!)
The book ends with the story of documentary photographer Dorothea
Lange, who took the definitive photo of the Depression.
She was born in New Jersey but she died in San Francisco at age 70.
She said that contracting polio as a child, which left her with a weakened right
leg, led to her pursuing a career in photography because of feeling shy and self-conscious
around people.
It was really uplifting to read this book and realize that there were
women in an era where "women" seemed to do little but take care of the house and
raise the children, accomplished great things.
Kinda makes me think of congress this week. Some male
congressman interviewed today pointed out that it was the men that caused this mess and it
took the women to bring an end to it.
I have been beyond furious since yesterday, and my mood did not improve as I read news reports today.
If you don't watch Rachel Maddow, please look at this 10 minute video clip. It starts with a report about the Westminster Dog Show, but then moves into what is happening in Virginia right now. If you are impatient, move the slider forward to about 3:30 minutes into the piece.
This is a report about the abortion bill (SB 484) in Virginia which will require women seeking abortions in Virginia (abortion, a legal medical procedure) a medically unnecessary vaginal probe (a transvaginal ultrasound) to determine gestational age of the embryo.
A Chicago Tribune article makes excellent points about this barbaric governmental intervention which the party of "smaller government" is trying to inflict on the women of Virginia.
To quote Tobias Barrington Wolff, Professor of Constitutional Law and Civil Procedure at the University of Pennsylvania Law School,
Try to envision the mindset of a legislator who would enact a bill the sole purpose of which is to mandate the forcible, medically unnecessary invasion of a woman's vagina as the price -- the attempt at forced shame -- for terminating a pregnancy. Whatever a person's views on abortion might be, this is an assault of a different order. It is one thing to believe that abortion should be restricted; it is quite another to use the law to impose humiliation and invasion upon women who seek out the procedure. A person cannot enact such a law without embracing a willful disregard for the personhood and dignity of all women.
An article in the Virginian Pilot says,
The bill, among the most invasive ever passed in Virginia, is the result of frustration by lawmakers opposed to abortion. Unsuccessful in making abortion illegal and unwilling to be frank about their goals, they have tried by technicality and obfuscation to make it harder for a woman to terminate a pregnancy.
And now this. In addition to the ultrasound, the bill mandates a waiting period of at least 2 hours and as long as a day before a woman can have an abortion. That waiting period has no medical necessity at all.....
Seeing the bill as a fait accompli, Virginia Representative David Englin sought to add an amendment that which would at least require that a woman give her permission to that medically unnecessary, state-ordered vaginal probe. The amendment failed by a vote of 64-34.
There is a similar bill being discussed in Texas and an article in the Houston Chronicle observes, a close reading of the Texas Penal Code, Section 22.011, suggests that the new law may also constitute a sexual assault upon women, which is a second-degree felony. The code defines a sexual assault as an offense in which a person intentionally or knowingly causes the penetration of the anus or sexual organ of another person by any means, without that person's consent. Furthermore, the law stipulates that one condition of nonconsent is met when the actor is a public servant who coerces the other person to submit or participate.
A transvaginal ultrasound may give a more clear picture of the embryo, but if there is no doubt that the woman is pregnant, what is the purpose of just seeing it more clearly, if not to make the whole procedure even more upsetting for the woman?
And then this morning there is a report on a contraceptive hearing where Republicans refuse to let women testify. Witnesses consisted of only male religious leaders, and a female college student was denied the right to voice her opinion because she was deemed not to have the appropriate credentials to testify.
These are the people who swept into office on the promise of creating jobs, reducing the deficit and bringing us smaller government. Yet there have been no jobs bills, and they are spending their time creating laws that will affect the very private lives of thousands of women across this country, without allowing the women to voice their opinion.
I feel paralyzed with anger and frustration....and this doesn't even affect me at all. I can only imagine how women of child-bearing years are feeling, if they are even aware of what is going on.
The all-male GOP leadership is calling on all-male religious leaders to decide whether birth control should be fully covered by insurance plans.