I was a devoted Tonight Show watcher since the Steve
Allen days, up through Carson's last show, and then into the Leno years, at
least for "headlines" until the business with Conan O'Brien, where Leno
decided to take his show back and leave O'Brien out in the cold. I
couldn't bring myself to watch the Tonight Show ever again after
that. Jimmy Fallon seems like a nice guy and the show is entertaining,
but I don't see myself ever watching it with the devotion that I gave to
The Tonight Show for decades, mostly because I don't know most of
today's "celebrities," especially not today's music. Call me a fuddy
duddy.
I was neither a Letterman fan (nothing against him, I just
never watched his show because I was loyal to The Tonight Show) or a
Colbert fan (just couldn't get into his vain Conservative shtik, though I
liked him as a comedian just fine), but I was interested to see his
first show, taking over for Letterman. The jury is still out.
Some funny bits, some "why did they do that?" bits, a band that I liked
better than any of the other late night bands, and I will watch again.
BUT...in the years when I zoned out on late night talk shows
have they all been like this, or was this one special? There were NINE
commercials (totaling nearly 5 minutes) between the George Clooney interview
and the show's return and eight commercials (nearly as long) between the end
of the Jeb Bush interview and the return to the show. I didn't count
the commercials in the other breaks, but I had the feeling that I was
watching an hour of commercials sponsored by Colbert interviews. I'm
thinking that if I decide to watch Colbert for awhile to see if I like the
show, I will just record it and zip thru the commercials, rather than
watching live.
It's like going to the movies (which I also rarely do) and
watching 20 minutes or so of previews before the actual feature film that
you have come to see.
And while I'm complaining about commercials, I hate two
other things--first those "funny" mini-movie commercials that run across the
bottom of the TV screen about upcoming shows, which are not only
distracting, but sometimes cover up something on the current show
that you want to see. And the new thing on the internet where you
click on a link to read an article and before you read the article you must
watch a commercial and then as you are reading the article, a video suddenly
starts playing in the right hand column and you have to search to find out
where to turn it off. It's all very annoying and has at least saved me
money because I wouldn't buy any of those products that annoy me so
much, whether I liked them or not.
And then there is Kentucky, the "united we stand, divided we
fall" state whose state dance is, appropriately, "clogging."
Along with Rachel Maddow, I will not name the County Clerk
who has been in all the news because she is getting enough personal
publicity everywhere else, but it's been great media fun. Her
checkered past, her latter day holier than thou stance. What people
forget in all the hype, is that it was never an "attack on Christianity"
which Mike Huckabee, in wonderful campaign photo ops tries to promote.
This is a woman who took an oath to carry out all legal transactions of her
business. Like it or not, marriage is a legal right of all American
citizens, gay and straight. She took it upon herself to ignore the law
and that got her jailed.
As someone pointed out, she put her hand on the bible and
swore to upload the constitution, not put her hand on the constitution and
swore to uphold the bible.
True, the Kentucky clerk had no reason to believe that her
duties would eventually disagree with her religious beliefs, but if she
feels that strongly about her beliefs, the answer is not to ignore the law
of the land, but to make a big show about resigning her position.
The sight of sanctimonious Huckabee supporting her stand
against a law with which he also disagrees is stomach turning. Have we
become a country where the law is irrelevant? If you don't agree with
a law, just ignore it and sue anyone who tries to hold you accountable for
it?
If you are Muslim, don't become a flight attendant and then
refuse to serve alcohol because it's against your religion (another case of
religious freedom currently in the courts).
I thought we were a country of checks and balances, where we
had a judiciary to legislate the legality of issues. When they make a
decision with which one side disagrees there are claims of "legislating from
the bench." If the court had upheld all those challenges to Obamacare,
you can be certain nobody would be crying foul, but there would have been
cheering that the Supremes saw things the right way.
The Rapture |
Quote from George Takei: "Well this is a bit of a circus. So let us be clear: This woman is no hero to be celebrated. She broke her oath to uphold the Constitution and defied a court order so she could deny government services to couples who are legally entitled to be married. She is entitled to hold her religious beliefs, but not to impose those beliefs on others. If she had denied marriage certificates to an interracial couple, would people cheer her? Would presidential candidates flock to her side? In our society, we obey civil laws, not religious ones. To suggest otherwise is, simply put, entirely un-American."
No comments:
Post a Comment