Back in the late 1950s/early 60s, there was an organization which got
lots of publicity. It was called the Society for the Indecency to Naked Animals
(SINA), whose aim was to clothe all naked animals, including pets, barnyard animals, and
large wildlife.
It was, of course, a hoax perpetrated by comedian Alan Abel, but we
were younger and more innocent then. It was before the internet, winning sweepstakes
tickets you never bought, and Nigerian royalty wanting to give us money. We were still a
people who could believe that Martians could land and take over a city. SINA took on a
life of its own with comedian Buck Henry posing as the group president, G. Clifford Prout
SINA actually had lots of ardent supporters and raised lots of money
for the cause. At one time the group claimed (falsely) that it had tens of thousands
of members.
The hoax was finally sniffed out in 1963 by a member of Walter
Cronkite's staff, during an interview with the newsman. Henry was recognized and the
jig was up, though Abel still kept the group going through its newsletter among people who
had not heard of the Cronkite incident.
(Kind of makes you wonder what you've missed lately, doesn't it?)
While the whole SINA thing was a hoax, I think that Abel missed a
very real indecency situation that has plagued this country for years, indecency that has
been perpetrated by the beloved Walt Disney right in front of our very eyes.
Look at how shocking this is. Two naked
animals cavorting in public rubbing tailfeathers with one another and all to the delight
of thousands of young children.
Throughout the career of Disney characters there seems to have been a
casual disregard to clothing vs. no clothing. Mickey was clothed right from the
beginning, in his first appearance as Steaboat Willie, but Donald came on the scene,
pantsless from the start, and then brought his girlfriend along too. She wore
jewelry, a hair ornament and high heels, but where were her pants? And who were the
parents of his naked nephews?
And then there is that whole naked cross-species thing.
They are obviously very...uh...close to each other. Eyore, may
even be a cross-dresser, since all "he" is wearing is a pink ribbon.
Shocking. Absolutely shocking.
If Disney was shocking, Warner Bros. took it to extremes.
The blatant sexuality of this picture cannot escape anybody looking
for it with an open mind. Or how about the message being sent by this naked couple:
And then there is that half well dressed bear stealing pic-a-nic
baskets from people in national parks. A hat and tie, definitely. Pants,
not so much.
Perhaps Alan Abel was pulling everyone's leg with his attempt to
clothe naked real animals, but I think he overlooked a great source corruption to
the country's children and a campaign he might actually have won.
When looking at indecency and what should be done about it, one
should always keep in mind the tiny tots.
1 comment:
In the later 1960's (I can place it between 1965 and 1968), my boss saw a listing in the New York phone book for that organization or a similar one.
Curious, he called the number and talked to someone who explained their mission. She assured him that it was necessary to clothe animals, because they were ashamed of being naked...
Post a Comment